irelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.ee to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoYou can see who upvoted and downvoted a post by viewing it in friendica.lemm.eeimagemessage-square170fedilinkarrow-up1387arrow-down118file-text
arrow-up1369arrow-down1imageYou can see who upvoted and downvoted a post by viewing it in friendica.lemm.eeirelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.ee to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square170fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarelambaliciouslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 month ago , which is of course faulty logic …which is why design systems so that when using them we can account for the human element, right? Come on! We have centuries-spanning systems even industries built on that! Engineering, avionics, Yelp reviews…
minus-squareatro_city@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoI think you’re forgetting the context of the discussion… Not them but yes but it’s not a feature of the system, it’s a failure of the humans. A system designed to be used by humans has an attribute bound to be exploited by humans and it’s the failure of humans for exploiting it.
…which is why design systems so that when using them we can account for the human element, right? Come on! We have centuries-spanning systems even industries built on that! Engineering, avionics, Yelp reviews…
I think you’re forgetting the context of the discussion…
A system designed to be used by humans has an attribute bound to be exploited by humans and it’s the failure of humans for exploiting it.