• ExtremeDullard
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    Bullshit.

    She agrees to put her name on it, she owns it. She’s not a victim of the Trump family, she’s an accomplice.

    • loathsome dongeater@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Agreed. My point was about the process. I am saying she signed off on a lucrative grift. But it makes her a grifter rather than a crypto sis. I would call her a crypto sis if she endorsed the technology. But I am sure she is clueless about it.

      • ExtremeDullard
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        But it makes her a grifter rather than a crypto sis

        Crypto bros are first and foremost scammers who happen to specialize in that particular kind of scam. Whether they understand the underlying technology or not doesn’t matter, the same way someone who pays a killer to shoot someone is a murderer even if they know nothing about firearms.

        She may be clueless about blockchains but she ain’t clueless about padding her bank account with suckers’ money.

        • loathsome dongeater@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          You are right about the fact that almost all crypto peddlers don’t understand the underlying technology. But what makes them crypto bros is that they peddle the technology regardless of their lack of comprehension. Melania does not do that which is why I made that differentiation.

          This has veered into the territory of not very important stuff though haha

          • ExtremeDullard
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            The thing is, it’s not like selling sketchy things is out of character for Melania. So she doesn’t lend herself to the benefit of the doubt here.

        • loathsome dongeater@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Assuming that a middle aged person with no known tech background does not know what a blockchain is is sexist? Please explain why.

          • KrasnaiaZvezda@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Partly is because the way you said it seemed like you wouldn’t have used the same words if it was a middle aged man, part is because it seemed to imply that she couldn’t understand this even if she tried to, while again making no mention of the men not being able to understand it, and if anything, assuming they do understand it, at least better than her.

              • KrasnaiaZvezda@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Agreed. My point was about the process. I am saying she signed off on a lucrative grift. But it makes her a grifter rather than a crypto sis. I would call her a crypto sis if she endorsed the technology. But rich people only care about money and not the technology.

                Saying something like that instead, pehaps