• @grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    220
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    >reboot to bootloader -> unlock -> you will use your warranty -> yes

    It’s fucking outrageous that companies are allowed to blatantly lie like that (you will not, in fact, lose your warranty – Federal law doesn’t allow it). Every company that displays such a fraudulent message ought to be fined by the FTC, or worse.

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      English
      731 month ago

      ought to be fined by the FTC, or worse

      Fines don’t work, just start throwing people in jail already.

      • @grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        261 month ago

        By its nature, the only penalties that can be applied to a corporate entity are fines or revoking its charter. The latter is what I had in mind when I wrote “or worse,” although I suppose piercing the corporate veil and going after the company’s executives personally is certainly an option too!

        • @Comment105@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          10
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          It’s insane to respect corporations’ rights when we know very well how pointless they are for the public’s interests. We want proper behavior and serious punishments. We don’t want to respect corporate and their rights.

          • @psud@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            21 month ago

            We might also need voting records so we know which members of the board need to be punished for corporate action

            • @Comment105@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              21 month ago

              And it there’s been a failure to keep voting records, punish the whole board. Be more ruthless to these fucks.

        • @ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          230 days ago

          You can pierce the corporate veil. "What lawyer approved it? Who was responsible for putting that message there?”.

          The corporation might not be able to be punished, but the actual people who did the thing can be.

          The corporate veil for legal action only makes sense for a limited number of things that are problematic for the company but no person could really be expected to have directly made the choice.

      • @grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        311 month ago

        The warning sticker on hardware is also bullshit.

        The TL;DR of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act is that if the manufacturer wants to deny your warranty claim, the burden is on them to prove that the owner’s “unreasonable use” (abuse), neglect of required maintenance, or modification of the product was the actual cause of the failure.

        For example, a car manufacturer can’t use the fact that you tinted the windows as an excuse to deny your claim for an engine failure, but they could deny it for your failure to perform oil changes.

        • Optional
          link
          fedilink
          111 month ago

          Unfortunately the TOS you agreed to says a ridiculous “arbitration” will determine who’s right that you abused the equipment - and guess who the arbitrator will decide for.

          • @grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 month ago

            Add it to the pile of reasons why, for products (as opposed to services), things like EULAs and ToS are unenforceable bunk.

            • Optional
              link
              fedilink
              21 month ago

              I’ve heard that from a lot of people, but never seen it in action. Someone who sues or somehow gets what they want in spite of arbitration, I’d like to see that.

    • The amount that companies lie about laws is just disgusting.

      Oftentimes most of the EULA isn’t even enforceable, but they put it there anyway. It really ought to be illegal to do that.