Maven (famous) to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 9 days agoI love new featureslemmy.zipimagemessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1344arrow-down14
arrow-up1340arrow-down1imageI love new featureslemmy.zipMaven (famous) to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 9 days agomessage-square44fedilink
minus-square@marcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink5•8 days agoYeah… But it’s usually a good practice to put a struct somewhere between your 30 levels of ownership. Exceptions exist, but they are not very common. Also, in C++, operators overloading may help you if you keep needing to write code like this.
minus-square@Gladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilink3•8 days agoIn C++ you should never have owning raw pointers. Unless you have a good reason™. Raw pointers are great, but not for ownership.
minus-square@Gladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilink4•8 days agoAnd you should. It even works for classes whose constructors your implementation cannot see, if you aren’t a bitch about it.
Yeah… But it’s usually a good practice to put a struct somewhere between your 30 levels of ownership.
Exceptions exist, but they are not very common. Also, in C++, operators overloading may help you if you keep needing to write code like this.
In C++ you should never have owning raw pointers. Unless you have a good reason™.
Raw pointers are great, but not for ownership.
I just use
unique_ptr99% of the timeAnd you should.
It even works for classes whose constructors your implementation cannot see, if you aren’t a bitch about it.