• Schadrach
    link
    English
    336 hours ago

    It’s the US, we put presidents and Founding Fathers on our bills. Harriet Tubman is neither, so of course we’re not putting her on the twenty.

    Instead we should compromise with historical precedent and put Obama on the twenty - he’s both a president and a black historical figure and he’ll piss off the people pissed off by the idea of Tubman on the twenty even more. It’s a win all around!

    • @AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      164 hours ago

      Anyone on the $20 would be better than Andrew “Trail of Tears” Jackson. The dude also caused the deepest, by percentage not dollar amount, and longest depression in US history by paying off the national debt.

      • @Scubus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 hours ago

        Hey, franklin pierce also sucked pretty hard. He didnt actually do anything, which is the problem. His lack of action dropped us right into the civil war iirc

      • @AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 hours ago

        I’ll get flamed for this but even trump would be better than Jackson.

        The only one who I can think of that’d be as bad is Bush Jr.

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54 hours ago

      That’s not a rule. It’s just what’s been done before. There is no rule that we can’t have Harriet Tubman on a bill. The universe will not end if we tell the traditionalists they are welcome to get in a time machine if they want to live in the past.

    • @Pickle_Jr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I appreciate the note about putting Obama on the bill, but the first sentence is incorrect. 😅

      The $10 (Alexander Hamilton) and $100 (Ben Franklin) do not feature presidents.

      Edit: welp if you Lemmy at 5 a.m then you might not be able to read well