• xigoi
    link
    English
    41 month ago

    Seeing the reaction to the bridge, it seems that most Mastodon users don’t want AtProto to be compatible with ActivityPub.

    • poVoq
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      If Bluesky was just another ActivityPub using site you could just defederate from it. This isn’t really possible when there are many bridges that relay messages.

      But you also seem to have completely misunderstood what people objected to about the ATProto bridge. It wasn’t the optional possibility to reach people on Bluesky. It was the automatic opt-in that most people objected to.

      • xigoi
        link
        English
        11 month ago

        By using the Fediverse, you implicitly opt in to having your content federated between different platforms. How is this any different?

        • poVoq
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          Not between platforms but within the Fediverse. Bluesky is not part of the Fediverse.

          • xigoi
            link
            English
            11 month ago

            The Fediverse is, by definition, anything that supports ActivityPub. If BlueSky supported ActivityPub – which is what the bridge was meant to accomplish – then it would be a part of the Fediverse.

            • poVoq
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 month ago

              A bridge by definition does not make Bluesky compatible with ActivityPub and also does not make it part of the Fediverse. There used to be bridges to Twitter as well, but that doesn’t mean Twitter supports activitypub or is part of the Fediverse.

    • Jupiter Rowland
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      Many Mastodon users are against both Bluesky and Threads federation because they want the Fediverse to remain only Mastodon.

      Little do they know that the Fediverse has never been only Mastodon.