• @lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    You seem to be under the impression that your not voting changes the binary outcome.

    This pyrrhic victory neglects to recognize that either Trump or Harris will be elected. And there is no circumstance that Trump is better than Harris. Not on women’s rights. Not on climate change. Not on Ukraine. And not on Gaza.

    Whether you like it or not, it’s Harris or Trump. Sticking your head in the sand doesn’t change this fact.

    So both the moral and pragmatic solution is to choose the lesser evil that gives the highest odds to improve all these groups. Which is Harris. Factually.

    • @Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -11 month ago

      You seem to be under the impression that your not voting changes the binary outcome.

      Me voting wouldn’t change the outcome either, considering I can’t.

       

      So both the moral and pragmatic solution is to choose the lesser evil

      Is killing wrong?

      • @lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yes, killing wrong.

        Killing more people with less chance to kill fewer people more wrong.

        Again, dichotomous choice. Easiest choice to make, really.

          • @lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            Correction: it is less wrong.

            Standing by and letting someone kill more when your action could’ve resulted in less makes you as culpable in the killing as Biden and Harris themselves.

              • @lennybird@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 month ago

                You can’t vote so you’re irrelevant but still, no, the only agency I’m privileged to have is my vote. Doing nothing means more die. Voting Harris means less die. Simple.