mox to Programming@programming.dev • 9 hours agoThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square31arrow-up1100arrow-down10cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.secpp@programming.dev
arrow-up1100arrow-down1external-linkThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.commox to Programming@programming.dev • 9 hours agomessage-square31cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.secpp@programming.dev
minus-square@MonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilink3•4 hours agoHonestly, i prefer that over minimal standard libraries where you need dotzens of changing depencies for the simplest stuff.
minus-squareTraister101linkfedilink3•3 hours agoNah standard libraries are great but C++ has a lot of… cruft. Maybe don’t plonk a lot of Rust in there despite all the positives
Honestly, i prefer that over minimal standard libraries where you need dotzens of changing depencies for the simplest stuff.
Nah standard libraries are great but C++ has a lot of… cruft. Maybe don’t plonk a lot of Rust in there despite all the positives
Sure, not saying C++ isn’t cluttered.