mox to Programming@programming.dev • 3 months agoThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square56arrow-up1203arrow-down12cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.secpp@programming.dev
arrow-up1201arrow-down1external-linkThe empire of C++ strikes back with Safe C++ proposalwww.theregister.commox to Programming@programming.dev • 3 months agomessage-square56cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.secpp@programming.dev
minus-square@MonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilink6•3 months agoHonestly, i prefer that over minimal standard libraries where you need dotzens of changing depencies for the simplest stuff.
minus-squareTraister101linkfedilink6•3 months agoNah standard libraries are great but C++ has a lot of… cruft. Maybe don’t plonk a lot of Rust in there despite all the positives
Honestly, i prefer that over minimal standard libraries where you need dotzens of changing depencies for the simplest stuff.
Nah standard libraries are great but C++ has a lot of… cruft. Maybe don’t plonk a lot of Rust in there despite all the positives
Sure, not saying C++ isn’t cluttered.