asudox to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 16 hours agoConcerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square104fedilinkarrow-up1496arrow-down16 cross-posted to: selfhosted@lemmy.worldbitwarden@lemmy.mllinux@programming.devlinux@lemmy.worldbitwarden@discuss.tchncs.denews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show
arrow-up1490arrow-down1external-linkConcerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.comasudox to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 16 hours agomessage-square104fedilink cross-posted to: selfhosted@lemmy.worldbitwarden@lemmy.mllinux@programming.devlinux@lemmy.worldbitwarden@discuss.tchncs.denews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show
minus-squareasudoxOPlinkfedilinkEnglish2•3 hours ago“You may not use this SDK to develop applications for use with software other than Bitwarden (including non-compatible implementations of Bitwarden) or to develop another SDK.” This is a condition when using their SDK. This is not considered a free (as in freedom) component because it violates freedom 0: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html#four-freedoms
Could you ELI5 please?
“You may not use this SDK to develop applications for use with software other than Bitwarden (including non-compatible implementations of Bitwarden) or to develop another SDK.”
This is a condition when using their SDK. This is not considered a free (as in freedom) component because it violates freedom 0: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html#four-freedoms