asudox to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 14 hours agoConcerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square103fedilinkarrow-up1483arrow-down16 cross-posted to: selfhosted@lemmy.worldbitwarden@lemmy.mllinux@programming.devlinux@lemmy.worldbitwarden@discuss.tchncs.denews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show
arrow-up1477arrow-down1external-linkConcerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.comasudox to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 14 hours agomessage-square103fedilink cross-posted to: selfhosted@lemmy.worldbitwarden@lemmy.mllinux@programming.devlinux@lemmy.worldbitwarden@discuss.tchncs.denews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show
minus-square@schizo@forum.uncomfortable.businesslinkfedilinkEnglish22•12 hours agoDon’t forget option 3: someone writes a vaultwarden client independent of the closed-source crap. If you can write a server that fully supports the client via the documented API, then you know everything you’d need to do to make a client as well.
minus-square@humorlessrepost@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish11•7 hours agoThat’s not a third option in the same list (things they are going to do), it’s an item in an entirely different list (foss responses to their actions).
Don’t forget option 3: someone writes a vaultwarden client independent of the closed-source crap.
If you can write a server that fully supports the client via the documented API, then you know everything you’d need to do to make a client as well.
That’s not a third option in the same list (things they are going to do), it’s an item in an entirely different list (foss responses to their actions).