asudox to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 months agoConcerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square203fedilinkarrow-up1733arrow-down1106 cross-posted to: bitwarden@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showselfhosted@lemmy.worldlinux@programming.devbitwarden@discuss.tchncs.delinux@lemmy.world
arrow-up1627arrow-down1external-linkConcerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Sourcewww.phoronix.comasudox to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square203fedilink cross-posted to: bitwarden@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showselfhosted@lemmy.worldlinux@programming.devbitwarden@discuss.tchncs.delinux@lemmy.world
minus-square@schizo@forum.uncomfortable.businesslinkfedilinkEnglish27•2 months agoDon’t forget option 3: someone writes a vaultwarden client independent of the closed-source crap. If you can write a server that fully supports the client via the documented API, then you know everything you’d need to do to make a client as well.
minus-square@humorlessrepost@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish13•2 months agoThat’s not a third option in the same list (things they are going to do), it’s an item in an entirely different list (foss responses to their actions).
Don’t forget option 3: someone writes a vaultwarden client independent of the closed-source crap.
If you can write a server that fully supports the client via the documented API, then you know everything you’d need to do to make a client as well.
That’s not a third option in the same list (things they are going to do), it’s an item in an entirely different list (foss responses to their actions).