@lousyd to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 2 days agoI'd have to hear her argument, but...lemmy.sdf.orgimagemessage-square137arrow-up11.21Karrow-down129
arrow-up11.18Karrow-down1imageI'd have to hear her argument, but...lemmy.sdf.org@lousyd to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 2 days agomessage-square137
minus-squareGingaNingacakelinkfedilink4•2 days agotechnically viruses aren’t alive. They just use cellular machinery to replicate and thats it.
minus-square@Nurse_Robot@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink14•edit-22 days agoEh, it’s not really that cut and dry. You could debate either way with plenty of evidence, in the end it’s really a limit to the semantics of language Edit: here’s a neat article that talks about it
minus-squareGingaNingacakelinkfedilink6•2 days agoThats pretty neat “you cant kill something thats not alive”. Can viruses respond to stimuli? We consider bacteria alive but viruses are debated, wheres the line? are enzymes alive? Are prions alive? cool article.
technically viruses aren’t alive. They just use cellular machinery to replicate and thats it.
Eh, it’s not really that cut and dry. You could debate either way with plenty of evidence, in the end it’s really a limit to the semantics of language
Edit: here’s a neat article that talks about it
Thats pretty neat “you cant kill something thats not alive”. Can viruses respond to stimuli? We consider bacteria alive but viruses are debated, wheres the line? are enzymes alive? Are prions alive? cool article.