• MadMaurice
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      That’s exactly the point I’m trying to make. “i5” as an answer would’ve made sense, but “5” doesn’t

      • @dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I get it - I was just emphasising it :P

        Was there a problem with the naming? I don’t see why they’d change it given they’ve spent a long time building the brand.

        • MadMaurice
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          Ha okay. I wasn’t quite sure whether you’re emphasizing or did misunderstood me.

          Honestly I have no idea what the issue was with the old naming scheme. Didn’t they just recently introduce an i9? Why not continue with an i11 etc instead of this Ultra nonsense.