• @TwilightKiddy@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      Caim ends up thinking he saved the world, but actually doomed humans in both timelines.

      Zero was stopping the weed. Not only did she have to murder her “sisters” for that, but she also kind of fucked it up, leading to the events of the first game.

      • @Spacehooks@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        Normally when I think villain, I’m thinking someone were the events of the world would have been better if they didn’t exist. I don’t recall if Caim running off would have made the word a better place. I saw he killed the boss and gave humanity time to start the Gestalt project. Now Nier is totally the villain here. Both versions of himself are dumb dumbs. At the very least Zero tried to clean up the mess cause if she did nothing the world was doomed anyway.

        • @TwilightKiddy@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          I think it’s pretty safe to assume that without Caim there would be no dragons and flower in the first timeline and no maso in the second one. At least people in the second one would survive until the alien invasion. If they fought back successfully, people in both timelines would survive just fine.

            • @TwilightKiddy@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 month ago

              Well, it’s never explicitly stated, but it’s the most convincing theory we have about the origins of Cathedral City and all that came with it.

              • @Spacehooks@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 month ago

                Ah I see. I aways took this at face value since it seemed made up by “The wild Dreams of a deluded child” and devs just went with it.