• stebo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -62 months ago

    think about how it must have felt for all those mothers who had to raise a daughter in an environment that has always been so hateful towards women…

      • stebo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -222 months ago

        i never said it was, and I’m sure your son will be fine.

        • @DomeGuy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          262 months ago

          Yes, you did. In approximately the same way that All Lives Matter was just a dog-whistley way of saying “No they don’t” to Black Lives Matter.

          When someone says I suffer from THING, responding with other people suffer too as your primary message is always a dismissal of the person’s suffering.

          If you want to avoid the inferred message, include an affirmative message of acknowledgement, like “nobody should suffer like that.”

          • stebo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -102 months ago

            If we’re going to compare this to BLM then you said something amongst the lines of “White people have to grow up in a world where everyone hates them.” and I responded “Actually, black people have had it worse.”

            If you are a cis white straight man, you are not oppressed. Stop trying to be.

            • @redisdead@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              72 months ago

              I’ve had the cops called on me for watching my nephew at the park.

              Go fuck yourself you fucking fuck.

            • Schadrach
              link
              English
              12 months ago

              If you are a cis white straight man, you are not oppressed. Stop trying to be.

              The entire model you are operating on has it’s roots in Marxist class conflict. Broadly the problem with that is that it was created in terms of economic class, and economic class is where it works best (or possibly at all). It can be shoehorned into other dynamics, but it only really works to the degree that that dynamic is also a proxy for economic class.

              For example, it works passably well for race in the US because broadly speaking race is a decent proxy for economic class in 21st century America, though less of one than it used to be. It’s a bad fit for sex or gender precisely because those things do not function as a proxy for economic class at all.

              • stebo
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 months ago

                the hell are you on about? this discussion was about men claiming everybody hates them, even though they’re privileged on most aspects of life. why do you start rambling about the working class?

                • Schadrach
                  link
                  English
                  12 months ago

                  I’m saying that the whole model of gender dynamics built on an oppressor/oppressed dichotomy you operate on is flawed in a way that makes it at best useless. That model has it’s roots in Marxist class conflict, and as a consequence the entire model and worldview only works as well as the alleged oppressor/oppressed dichotomy in question functions as a proxy for economic class. Which is why it works imperfectly for race, and even worse for sex/gender. You could literally make an argument for oppressed/oppressor zip codes and it would fit the model better than it does to sex/gender.

                  As an analogy, the model you operate on is like a geocentric model of the solar system. It’s just plain not accurate, and every time it’s made absolutely clear it’s not accurate another apologetic is stitched on like epicycles and deferents were used to shoehorn geocentric models into line with observations instead of being willing to take the leap that it’s bad model and should be tossed. This is where we get things like “the patriarchy hurts men too!” in exactly the way that no one would dare talk about how white supremacy hurts white people or capitalism hurts billionaires.

                  But as far as hating men, just look at the news media and reporting on various issues in the world. When “1/4 of the people this bad thing happens to are women!” is a call to action that something needs to be done to protect specifically women from the bad thing (see homelessness or suicide) which should be a hint about how men are viewed.

                  When you see casualties from some tragedy or another divided into women, children and “other”, when you can go on your social media of choice and it’s broadly acceptable to shit on men as a group with no qualifiers but you need to be extremely narrow and specific to say anything negative about any woman that should be another.

                  Hell, Reddit admins outright officially stated that their rules against hate speech do not apply to speech attacking men.

                  When you look at domestic violence resources, that should be a hint (yes, men are less often victims than women but the difference is not remotely as large as the difference in available resources).

                  Or look at heath care funding - there are numerous cutouts for women’s health in the ACA while the word “men” only occurs in the context of “men and women” and ACA coverage of contraception includes every kind of FDA recognized contraceptive, including barrier methods…for women. Cancer research funding (including government funding) is dramatically higher for cancers that are female-specific or massively female majority (breast, cervical, ovarian, etc) than for cancers that are male-specific or massively male majority (testicular, prostate, etc).

                  Kentucky passed a law a few years requiring judges in contested custody cases start from the presumption that equal custody is best unless there’s a good reason otherwise, as opposed to just starting from their own biases - this was heavily protested by women’s groups for…some reason.

                  Title fucking IX (a law that just outright bans sex discrimination in any federally funded educational program in the US) is consistently implemented in a way that is biased against men and boys in education, a great example being that the current US government website explaining how to handle Title IX claims outright says that if a girl wants to play a sport and there is no girl’s team she must be allowed to try out for the boy’s team and be put on the team if she’s capable but if a boy wants to play a sport and there is no boy’s team there is no requirement to allow him anything at all. There have been a fuckton of lawsuits over the last decade or so from boys accused of sexual assault in an educational context going through the system and being denied due process over things like: not being allowed to know what the process actually is or how school officials are trained for it, not being allowed access to exculpatory evidence the school had, not being allowed to know what evidence was being arrayed against them until immediately before proceedings so that they wouldn’t know what they needed to defend against, not being told what the accusation actually was or who was accusing them until the hearing so they couldn’t build a defense at all, not being allowed to have legal counsel present, that kind of thing. Even one case where a boy accused a girl of sexually assaulting him and when she found out she accused him of doing the same in response so his accusation was tossed as being retaliatory, and no I didn’t get my pronouns wrong in that and yes it is fucked up.

                  And the sad part is I can keep going with stuff like this for thousands and thousands of words and you probably won’t read it, and if you do you’ll probably ignore it or simply dub it misogyny and call me an incel or w/e. And the even sadder part is that this is the tip of a huge and depressing iceberg.

            • @DomeGuy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              The plane rules of rhetoric do not change simply because a thing is not oppression. I’m just a rando adding comment to down vote to express what I think was done wrong.

              Thosen two quotes are an excellent example of my principle, actually. The second one when given as a response to the first carries all the factionalist racism and denial of your last line.

              • stebo
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                so I’m racist now for saying white men are not not all white men are oppressed? alright then sure bud

                • @DomeGuy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  There are plenty of white-appearing men who suffer oppression, just not from the civil society of the USA on account of their gender or apparent ancestry.

                  Plenty of “white men” are gay, trans, left-handed, Jewish, atheist, nearsigjted, handicapped, neurodivergent, or mentally ill. It is absolutely racist to assume that a “white man” is not oppressed just because they are white and a man.

                  (Unless of course you hold fast to Patricia Bidol-Padva’s thesis, in which case it would merely be “racially prejudical.”.)

                  (edit: wrote “autistic” twice and said sex when I meant gender.)

                  • stebo
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    02 months ago

                    I’m talking about men in general. Of course some of them belong to other minorities, but this argument is about the person who complained about having to raise a son in a world that allegedly hates men.

          • stebo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -52 months ago

            No one is asking them to see themselves as monsters? You’re creating a problem where there isn’t one.

              • stebo
                link
                fedilink
                English
                02 months ago

                to be better than a bear probably?

                • @elidoz@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  32 months ago

                  children already know to be better than bears, what this argument provides for them is a window into what other people assume based only on gender

                  • stebo
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    12 months ago

                    then why are so many men worse than bears

          • @JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -7
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            No one is telling boys that they are monsters.

            It is helpful that they know there are humans in the world who behave like monsters, and that some of them are men who target people who they perceive to be weaker than themselves.

            So children, women, other men who are either physically smaller or in a lower position of power. That’s what they need to know. So they can protect themselves, and help stop others from becoming someone else’s monster if the opportunity arises.

            Doing things like speaking out against sexual harassment, and calling out bullying behavior, this is everyone’s responsibility btw. Not just men’s and boys, but this is what needs to be taught so world can suck less.

    • atro_city
      link
      fedilink
      -62 months ago

      Women are the most hated people the world over. No advantages, only downsides. Any man to ever walk the earth can never experience the equivalent horrors of being despised as much as a woman.

      Edit: /s. Do people seriously think this way?

      • ObjectivityIncarnate
        link
        fedilink
        English
        122 months ago

        You’re massively ignorant of just how little the world cares about the suffering of males. The same amount of harm to a female will, ten out of ten times, generate more sympathy and outrage than that same harm to a male.

        When Boko Haram attacked hundreds of thousands of children, the only reports that generated any outrage were the ones talking only about girls being kidnapped, even though they murdered all the boys. Hell, when the victims were all male, the sex wasn’t even stated in the articles, it’s just “students” etc. But every single time girls were victimized, you’d better believe “girls” or “schoolgirls” was explicitly used. The reason is simple–people in general actually give a shit about girls.

        The empathy gap between the sexes is very real, and your comment is a perfect example of it.

        • atro_city
          link
          fedilink
          52 months ago

          I really should’ve used /s . I thought the hyperbole would make it obvious, but it’s a little sad we live in the world where people might actually truly believe it.

        • atro_city
          link
          fedilink
          52 months ago

          It was supposed to be hyperbolic and sarcastic, but it looks like such beliefs can actually be held.

          • @DomeGuy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            62 months ago

            Sarcasm and hyperbole are two of my favorite things, but Poe’s ls is a real thing.

            Without a clear indicator of intent, it’s impossible to distinguish snark from extremism