Will it be effective?

Spoiler

No, it was not very effective.

EDIT: The banning event continues. Please consult the modlog to observe.

https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&modId=7121342

If you scroll down to about a day ago, you might be able to observe an emerging behavior from this mod.

EDIT 2: The mod in question moderates a total of 108 Lemmy communities. How deep does this conspiracy run? Is this mod a lost Redditor? More to come!

EDIT 3: The mod has now removed my comment all together, one might assume because it was still receiving upvotes in the 2 hours following my ban. Are there similarities here to Watergate? You be the judge!

EDIT 4: The mod in question has now been removed as a mod of the !vegan@lemmy.world community, as a result of their abuse of power.

https://lemmy.world/post/19731457

This was their response:

EDIT 5: This will be my final update, since as far as I see it, the issue this thread focuses on has been resolved. To quote Beaver herself in a very ironic comment she made directed towards someone else:

Clearly this was all just a case of…

  • Dr. WeskerOPEnglish
    2•3 months ago

    I was never there, I was merely passing through All.

    • @GBU_28@lemm.eeEnglish
      17•3 months ago

      Increasingly I believe communities should be able to hide from All. I step into places without realizing it too. They want an echo bunker, not a public sidewalk

      To expand:

      c/veganism isn’t actually a place to discuss the merits or news about vegan topics, or recipes.

      It’s a place for vegans, and only vegans, to share likeminded opinions on their world view. This is not unique to this community.

      Being a non vegan, and sharing a non vegan opinion there is not what they want. They find it offensive, and nearly bannable in general.

      Ultimately, that’s ok, it’s their community.

      The problem comes in when their posts land on All, where anyone sees it and feels invited to read and comment and vote. (Which I believe they are). So a mechanism to keep them off All would be useful to discourage people “walking by”

      • Blaze (he/him)English
        9•3 months ago

        Increasingly I believe communities should be able to hide from All.

        Definitely

        • @GBU_28@lemm.eeEnglish
          7•3 months ago

          And I would say with such a rule, places shouldn’t have a rule 5 style rule AND be found on All. It should be either or. If you expose yourself to the public (to expand traffic), you.have to be thick skinned enough to handle public banter, which will not align with the community core.

        • @GBU_28@lemm.eeEnglish
          3•3 months ago

          Well put.

          If outsider opinions are nearly always considered “bad faith”, the situation is a systemic issue with the visibility of the group.

      • Dr. WeskerOPEnglish
        2•3 months ago

        What I mean to say is I didn’t enjoy a stay. My comment was made in a manner I would have made in any other community that popped up on All, that was serving up terrible meme after terrible meme. I wasn’t there to do anything.

        • @MindTraveller@lemmy.caEnglish
          -1•3 months ago

          If you were never a member of the community, then you’ve lost nothing from being banned, and the mod was right to decide that your comment wasn’t a good faith contribution from a member of the community.