A retired Aurora police sergeant faces criminal charges for raping his daughter and continually sexually assaulting her and his two adopted daughters, but he remains free from custody while his ex-wife is in jail for objecting to court-ordered reunification therapy meant to repair his relationship with two of his sons.

  • @ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    175
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    his ex-wife is in jail for objecting to court-ordered reunification therapy meant to repair his relationship with two of his sons.

    Yeah, because top priority when encountering a piece of shit incestual paedophilic rapist, is to reunite him with the children he set aside while he preyed on the others. 🤯🤬

    Be it a system or an individual - abusers defend abusers. It’s always projection in self defence, it’s why they’ve constructed an elaborate conspiracy theory about secret paedophile rings run by the rich and powerful, yet when someone rich and powerful (and white and straight), and those who serve them, acts in direct defence of a paedophile, they look the other way.

    The judge who made this ruling, along with everyone who enabled it, need to have their hard drives searched and the children in their lives questioned and potentially removed for their safety. I don’t have a single doubt in my mind that if they did this, they would find at least one more paedophile.

    As for the mother and kids, I hope they sue the state or the court or whoever it is they can, and win millions to pay for the new life they’re going to need to build for themselves and therapy they’re going to need for the rest of their lives (never mind compensation for the obscene miscarriage of justice of locking her up).

    • TheTechnician27
      link
      fedilink
      English
      554 months ago

      piece of shit incestual paedophilic rapist

      Pro tip for concise writing: this can be simplified to the word “cop”.

      • @ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        55
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I mean, ACAB, but there are plenty of piece of shit incestual paedophilic rapists who aren’t cops, and I don’t see why they should be excluded.

        • @Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          154 months ago

          From personal experience, they tend to be authoritarians with an inflated sense of self-esteem which means they enjoy blaming victims. Which is not an uncommon set of traits for a cop.

    • @octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      244 months ago

      The judge who made this ruling, along with everyone who enabled it, need to have their hard drives searched and the children in their lives questioned and potentially removed for their safety. I don’t have a single doubt in my mind that if they did this, they would find at least one more paedophile.

      I think it’s just the legal system protecting cops, like it always does.

      • @ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Sure, there’s that, but it’s only part of a much bigger problem (that is why society at large allows cops, and other figures of authority, to get away with shit to the point where it’s a cliche. The problem is the patriarchy and the rape culture it cultivates).