• @ramenu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    53 months ago

    Well, I disagree about Signal. Proton however, I agree is extremely shady and should be avoided at all costs.

    • JaggedRobotPubes
      link
      fedilink
      English
      103 months ago

      That’s pretty strong and I’ve never seen or heard anything like it before. If it’s true I’m betting the rest of Lemmy would like some details, too.

      • @ramenu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        No support for Monero despite it being requested on uservoice 6 years ago. A Bitcoin wallet (seriously?) which is easily traceable. Important email metadata is also not zero access encrypted (i.e., subject headers, from/to headers) which leaks a substantial amount of information even if the body is encrypted. Not to mention they had clearnet redirects from their onion service a while back, something a lot of honeypots usually do.

        Even if it’s not a honeypot, you’re sure as hell not getting any privacy with Proton. That’s for sure.

        • @ScreaminOctopus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          53 months ago

          You can’t e2e the to and from headers in an email. that’s a problem with the protocol, not with proton. I’d assume the subject line falls into a similar bucket, because mailservers probably want to use it to filter spam