• @exanime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    03 months ago

    no, you are right… track record shows USA is interested in defending other countries for the sake of freedom, liberties and the American way… not at all for self interest

    • @prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Nobody said it wasn’t for self interest, it’s just nothing like the situation between Taiwan and China at all. Like not even close. I think you need to inform yourself on some regional history.

    • @andrewth09@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      43 months ago

      No country takes action based on moral grounds. They only take action for their self interest. This is international relations 101. Sometimes these align! Sometimes… not so much.

      What Taiwan has done is made the “good” outcome (Taiwan remains free and independent) align with the US’s self interest (having computers and a tech based economy).

      The US will always exert power over Taiwan, so will China. That’s just what great powers do. However, China doesn’t need to threaten an invasion to do this. There is no reason China can’t relinquish their claim on Taiwan and just build a casual trade relationship with Taiwan.

      • @exanime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        However, China doesn’t need to threaten an invasion to do this. There is no reason China can’t relinquish their claim on Taiwan and just build a casual trade relationship with Taiwan.

        Not justifying China’s methods or intentions at all, but you know what you are claiming is impossible

        The USA can (and has before) forbidden third parties to run businesses with other countries… As they have already done to China itself.

        It would be completely naive for China to assume they won’t be cut off from the very valuable industry Taiwan has once the USA establishes itself as the sole/mayority buyer