Which will probably be never.

  • @CodeMonkey@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    C does exactly what you tell it, no more. Why waste cycles setting a variable to a zero state when a correct program will set it to whatever initial state it expects? It is not user friendly, but it is performant.

    • @marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      73 months ago

      Except that this is wrong. C is free to do all kinds of things you didn’t ask it to, and will often initialize your variables without you writing it.

      • @nexussapphire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        Machine code would be a better example of what he’s talking about imo. Not an expert or anything of course.

        • @marcos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          33 months ago

          Odds are that your computer doesn’t export any language where it will do exactly as you say (amd64 machine code certainly won’t execute exactly as written). And how much difference it makes varies from one language to another.

          But the specific example from the OP, of uninitialized variables, is one of those cases where the C spec famously goes completely out of line and says your code can do whatever, run with a random value, fail, initialize it, format your hard drive, make a transaction on your bank account… whatever.

          • @Hack3900@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            23 months ago

            Coding in C but if I don’t initialize a Variable the compiler formats my drive! (Not Clickbait)

    • @nexussapphire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13 months ago

      It wouldn’t be that much processing compared to the rest of the app. It would lot more efficient than running an effectively infinite loop or arithmetic on an arbitrarily large number as a result of an unsigned variables.