• AnonTwo
      link
      fedilink
      2411 months ago

      It makes sense if you think about it like basic marketing

      But the thing is Youtube already promoted channels through it’s algorithm. Having to pay for it implies that something has changed regarding it.

      • sab
        link
        fedilink
        1411 months ago

        I think what’s worse is that the content seemed to be less visible even to his subscribers. The discoverability of your content to new people who are not actively looking for it is one thing, bit hiding it from people who have actively said they want to view it is another thing entirely.

        • FistfulOfStars
          link
          fedilink
          2311 months ago

          the content seemed to be less visible even to his subscribers

          Am I the only one who still uses the subscriptions page? I get a chronological list of all my subscribed channel’s video releases. I have seen zero indication that I’m missing anything at all, and I fairly frequently go to channel’s pages to check that my subscription list is complete.

          I’ve never clicked a single notification bell, and don’t rely on the home page’s recommendations/sorting, unless I’m actively seeking out new recommendations.

          • PupBiru
            link
            fedilink
            2111 months ago

            it became clear to me that the main discovery page on youtube would never be of any use to me when it suggested a video entitled “Andrew Tate Tucker Carlson Interview” by the channel “Gentleman Masterclass” and i almost projectile vomited all over my keyboard

            • sab
              link
              fedilink
              311 months ago

              I try to give as little data about myself to Google as possible, so I do not maintain subscriptions on YouTube. The recommendations from youtube are awful beyond belief. And somehow the search function is even worse - I really cannot find shit other than whatever their algorithm wants to push on me.

              One example: searching for Buddy Holly gives me the video “My drummer said that RINGO sucks, so I dared him to play THIS Beatles beat” as one of the first results, along with a video I’ve already watched of Chuck Berry jamming out with Keith Richards. On which fucking universe is this what I would be looking for with that search term. Meanwhile, even slightly obscure live recordings are almost impossible to find.

              YouTube has made itself practically worthless to me. I don’t want to spend my life watching what their algorithm wants to shove down my throat, and the way it currently works it’s hardly any good for watching anything else.

              • @fuzzywolf23@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                311 months ago

                I mean, you’re in whatever the opposite of a sweet spot is. If you want better recommendations, you have to rate and maintain a subscription page. It takes information – a lot of it – to get a good personalized feed.

                I’ve found my home page to be very useful – it even recognizes I want to watch certain channels at different times of day.

                • sab
                  link
                  fedilink
                  211 months ago

                  Yes, I’m bringing it on myself by not allowing them to create a good profile for me. I do, however, believe that the search function worked much better a few years ago. I don’t really want content recommended to me on the front page, but it still amazes me how hard they are trying to become TikTok in the recommendations I do get served.

          • @nofunberg@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 months ago

            You are not the only person who just uses Subscriptions. I do, too.

            And I am considering using rss to track channel updates instead of Subscriptions so I can see what’s new without going to YouTube directly. Less likely to get hit by distractions.

    • Chahk
      link
      fedilink
      1211 months ago

      Google is triple-dipping at this point. Youtube advertisers are already paying, they want users to pay, and now they want content creators to pay. Might as well also ask their CDNs to pay at this point. Also don’t forget to have the Linux Foundation pay for the privilege of having their source code in Google’s proprietary codebase.

        • Chahk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          511 months ago

          Some fair points. Your convention analogy doesn’t really work though. What would happen if convention organizers started asking the talent they are booking to also pay?

          More people are catching onto the “I have altered the deal, pray I don’t alter it any further” mentality of huge corporations that have only gotten to where they are because of content creators, and it should scare Google.

    • HobbitFoot
      link
      fedilink
      411 months ago

      It is, but the idea of such is shockingly new to a lot of YouTubers. A lot of them will just trust the algorithm when they get good growth metrics and hate it when growth stalls.