With evidence mounting on the failure to limit global warming to 1.5C, do you think global carbon emissions will be low enough by 2050 to at least avoid the most catastrophic climate change doomsday scenarios forecast by the turn of the century?

I am somewhat hopeful most developed countries will get there but I wonder if developing countries will have the ability and inclination to buy into it as well.

  • jsveiga
    link
    fedilink
    7011 months ago

    We’ll not meet the goal limit, climate will change, the poor will suffer all the consequences, the rich will be mildly inconvenienced. Habitats will be destroyed, species will go extinct, life will go on.

    • @DrQuint@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      511 months ago

      Pretty much. The outcome is simple. By 2050, the rich will start moving their houses north-er than they already do, south asia and europe will be considered pre-tropical. America will start hearing the words “desertification” but people on the south border will still vote against their interests.

      By 2150 the rich, whose numbers will already be severely culled, will run out of North to run to.

      • jsveiga
        link
        fedilink
        311 months ago

        By that time, Antartica will be the place to go.

    • @puppy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -611 months ago

      species will go extinct, life will go on

      Bro did you just contradict yourself on the same sentence?

      • @joshinator@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Species also went extinct when that rock killed the dinosaurs, life still went on. Took a few years to recover, but it went on.

        Only question is, will humanity go exting before we pump too much CO2 into the atmosphere to end up like Venus.

      • jsveiga
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        No, there are more than one species in the planet.