Johnson claimed that Trump violently raped her when she was 13 at a 1994 orgy hosted by Jeffrey Epstein — the billionaire who was convicted in 2008 of soliciting an underage girl for prostitution and has been accused of having sex with more than 30 underage girls.

Johnson said Trump had sexual contact with her at four of those parties, including tying her to a bed and violently raping her in a “savage sexual attack.” The lawsuit said Johnson “loudly pleaded” with Trump to stop, but that he responded by “violently striking Plaintiff in the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted.”

  • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I guess Sarcasm really is above some people. I never disputed what they said no matter how hard you want to twist this narrative.

    Everyone knew it was sarcasm but why you decided to start all sarcastic about it.

    I just answered their pondering with sarcasm because of how ridiculous this whole thing is.

    What was ridiculous about it, in your mind?

    You must be on the spectrum to push this hard on me being snarky.

    I don’t think they take that kind of comments well here. I don’t mind but just a heads up.

    • @Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      15 months ago

      Classic overreact to my overreaction.

      I would have probably just pissed off after venting a couple times about the ridiculousness of arguing legal semantics in a case involving one of the most prolific serial rapists of our time.

      How tone-deaf it looks… but you all haven’t experienced rape firsthand. You don’t have daughters who have been raped.

      • @Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        You think the difference between someone losing a case and the case against them being dismissed/dropped is legal semantics…? Not to mention, the first person was just wondering what case it was they said Trump lost…