@some_guy to News@lemmy.world • 6 months agoJudge says FTC lacks authority to issue rule banning noncompete agreementsarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square50arrow-up1524arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up1518arrow-down1external-linkJudge says FTC lacks authority to issue rule banning noncompete agreementsarstechnica.com@some_guy to News@lemmy.world • 6 months agomessage-square50file-text
minus-square@dudinax@programming.devlinkfedilink30•6 months agoYou missed the news where the Supremos say they’re the only regulators that matter now. In the decision before that they legalized bribery.
minus-squareI Cast Fistlinkfedilink12•6 months agoNot bribery, just a surprise gift after doing a favor without being promised anything in return! Totally different thing, you guys!! /s
minus-square@Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish4•6 months agoYou know they’ll start pulling shit like ‘You do this new thing for me and I’ll tip you for that other thing you did for me in the past <wink>’
minus-square@dudinax@programming.devlinkfedilink3•edit-26 months agoA gratuity of 10k. I guess for the corrupt members of the court, $10k and $10 are about the same.
You missed the news where the Supremos say they’re the only regulators that matter now. In the decision before that they legalized bribery.
Not bribery, just a surprise gift after doing a favor without being promised anything in return! Totally different thing, you guys!! /s
You know they’ll start pulling shit like ‘You do this new thing for me and I’ll tip you for that other thing you did for me in the past <wink>’
A gratuity of 10k. I guess for the corrupt members of the court, $10k and $10 are about the same.