@lysdexic@programming.devM to C++@programming.devEnglish • 4 days agoP2996R4 - Reflection for C++26isocpp.orgmessage-square3fedilinkarrow-up111arrow-down10cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
arrow-up111arrow-down1external-linkP2996R4 - Reflection for C++26isocpp.org@lysdexic@programming.devM to C++@programming.devEnglish • 4 days agomessage-square3fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
minus-square@lambaliciouslinkEnglish1•3 days ago No requires(requires(... No decltype((auto)) No noexcept(noexcept(... To be fair, it’s quite an advancement considering what I was expecting. Just about my only question is why the return is a string and not a `string_view``.
To be fair, it’s quite an advancement considering what I was expecting.
Just about my only question is why the return is a
string
and not a `string_view``.