@0x0@programming.dev to BSD@programming.devEnglish • 16 days agoFreeBSD 14.1 vs. DragonFlyBSD 6.4 vs. NetBSD 10 vs. Linux Benchmarkswww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square3fedilinkarrow-up120arrow-down10cross-posted to: linux@sopuli.xyzfoss@beehaw.orglinux@lemmy.worldlinux@lemmy.mlopensource@lemmy.worldopensource@lemmy.mlbsd
arrow-up120arrow-down1external-linkFreeBSD 14.1 vs. DragonFlyBSD 6.4 vs. NetBSD 10 vs. Linux Benchmarkswww.phoronix.com@0x0@programming.dev to BSD@programming.devEnglish • 16 days agomessage-square3fedilinkcross-posted to: linux@sopuli.xyzfoss@beehaw.orglinux@lemmy.worldlinux@lemmy.mlopensource@lemmy.worldopensource@lemmy.mlbsd
minus-square@cmeerw@programming.devlinkfedilink1•16 days agoCan anyone explain why there is such a huge difference in some of the benchmarks: Poll, Forking, CPU Cache, Semaphores, Socket Activity, Context Switching (all Stress-NG). Can we really trust these tests?
Can anyone explain why there is such a huge difference in some of the benchmarks: Poll, Forking, CPU Cache, Semaphores, Socket Activity, Context Switching (all Stress-NG). Can we really trust these tests?