@Stamau123@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 19 days ago_____ Rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up1252arrow-down10
arrow-up1252arrow-down1image_____ Rulelemmy.world@Stamau123@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • 19 days agomessage-square83fedilink
minus-square@Randelung@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink24•19 days agoThis feels like a word that would be both singular and plural. Like sheep. Two wug.
minus-square@Robaque@feddit.itlinkfedilink6•edit-218 days agoOnly if the amount of wug is a prime number. This is because non-prime numers of wuggi are highly unstable and will split into separate prime factors of wug if there’s enough space (and in most atmospheric conditions).
This feels like a word that would be both singular and plural. Like sheep.
Two wug.
Only if the amount of wug is a prime number.
This is because non-prime numers of wuggi are highly unstable and will split into separate prime factors of wug if there’s enough space (and in most atmospheric conditions).