• @Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    66 months ago

    Your experience as someone who tried it for a week probably doesn’t reflect that of people who used it professionally for many years. Part of what made it valuable to media people was the ubiquity of possible sources, but it takes some time and work to develop links to those sources and to the professional contacts who have their own connections to share.

    • @exanime@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      66 months ago

      I’m a consumer of news, how would I compare my experience to someone using it professionally?

      I’m saying watching baseball was boring and you are telling me playing baseball is fun. Two different things

      • @Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        The experience of a news consumer is going to be different from that of a professional journalist. Kinda like the experience of eating a burger is different from working in a kitchen. Yeah, they’re two different things, we were talking journalism. Twitter was never great for news as a consumer imo, but it was a very valuable resource for journalists. I’m not sure how good X is for either but I’m pretty sure nether experience will have improved.

        • @exanime@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 months ago

          Yes I get that, but what’s the point of “twitter for journalists” if we separate that from people consuming said news? Basically you are saying Twitter is a great note gathering tool for journalists?

          Even your claim that it was a great source for journalists I find sus. Maybe lazy journalists that only parrot twitter quotes. Where is the investigation? Corroboration? Context?

          I’m not sure how good X is for either but I’m pretty sure nether experience will have improved.

          In this we agree 100%