• nifty
    link
    fedilink
    -421 days ago

    That’s a good question, I am getting it from here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_Queen_Story_Hour

    The program strives to “capture the imagination and play of gender fluidity of childhood and gives kids glamorous, positive, and unabashedly queer role models”.[8]

    Preferably, kids should have high talent and high skill queer role models, simply because the world is tough and I don’t want progressive kids to end up shark chum.

    To clarify where I am coming from: I am an advocate for queer rights, and that includes anyone who does drag. So if we’re bringing in drag queens for story hour, maybe a compromise is that the performer should be something else too, like a ballerina or firefighter (as mentioned my preference is STEM). I don’t care, but simply being a drag queen is not enough. I am sorry

    • @bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      Why isn’t it enough? And the next paragraph after your snippet says exactly what behavior they are modeling for the children.

      Nina West argues drag lets children be “creative” and “think outside the boxes us silly adults have crafted for them.”

      Creativity and individualism.

      • nifty
        link
        fedilink
        -121 days ago

        Why can’t we find outlets for creativity which require skill or talent?

          • @Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            021 days ago

            That’s a pretty flimsy argument lol, I think again it’s a bit silly to just assume a drag book reading is immediately going to lead all the children to look up to drag models and want to emulate it.

            • @bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              320 days ago

              Yeah it is but apparently nifty doesn’t get the whole value of charity+acceptance+individualism+reading or something.