• @Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      235 months ago

      Because it was built at the thinnest part of the content and used existing lakes?

      Pretty sure Omaha would have loved an East\West canal across the continent.

        • @Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          85 months ago

          But it was done, which is kind of the opposite of NIMBY. Also it’s not a project that could go anywhere, except that no one wants it.

          Closing Guantanamo was a NIMBY thing because, while everyone agrees it should happen, no one wanted the detainees in their backyard. (As ridiculous as that is.)

          • @Rayspekt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -15 months ago

            The Panama canal was a US NIMBY project I’d argue. Give us the canal but without impacting our territory.

            • @Cypher@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              45 months ago

              Your comment is actually insane.

              There is no way the US would not have preferred the canal to be in their backyard.

            • @AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              We didn’t maintain administration of the canal for just over a century for no reason. We would have put that shit in the Rio Grande, if we could have. Unfortunately that river runs dry for several months a year.

              Especially since that particular area of the world is some of the least developed.