• @disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    Asylum seekers are categorized with migrants at the border. They only differ in desire to get a job once they enter. They’re given one year of amnesty to determine if they want to naturalize or move to another nation. They’re offered free housing in sanctuary cities. The cities are now full from lack of state funding and no Federal support. Congress failed to pass reform that could support these cities or mandate acceptance in other cities. There’s nothing left to do but choose from the three options I mentioned above.

    Immigrants are people who enter the nation with intent to naturalize. They have more Federal rights than migrants, but a more complex legal journey ahead.

    The Muslim ban was discriminatory trash, and nothing like this. It outlawed any immigration (asylum seekers, refugees, migrants, or immigrants) for Muslims or “suspected Muslims.” It absolutely was illegal, and despicable to boot.

    • @goferking0OP
      link
      -325 days ago

      Again this is Biden doing the Muslim ban for legally protected asylum seekers.

      This is only an EO for those protected people.

      • @disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        25 days ago

        Do you have a source on the discrimination in this Executive Order? I haven’t seen anything on religious restrictions in any articles.

        Or is your confusion still on the terms migrant and asylum seeker? They’re not people of a specific religion.

        https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/refugees-asylum-seekers-and-migrants/

        Immigrants are not provided with emergency housing, so we can accept them. We simply do not have the housing that we guarantee migrants seeking asylum, so the options are homelessness, detainment, or restriction on entry.