• @istanbullu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    317 months ago

    Bush Jr should have been convicted for mass murder. Obama should have been convicted for drone strikes.

    • @Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      457 months ago

      I’m not disagreeing with you, but at least those awful actions are plausibly covered as a presidential act made in the country’s interests. I’m not saying they were good for the US, just that they could argue that was the process.

      Trump’s shit is all self-serving and against the interests of the United States.

      • @istanbullu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17 months ago

        presidential act made in the country’s interests.

        If your country’s interests require committing mass murder (like Bush Jr or Obama did), then your country is an awful evil place.

        • @Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          67 months ago

          I cannot disagree with you there!

          That’s mostly what I meant by this sentence:

          I’m not saying they were good for the US, just that they could argue that was the process.

          Even if they make the worst, most destructive decisions that most of their constituents disagree with, it’s still a presidential act. I assume they can’t be charged in the US. Might be different in an international court, but I think we refuse to recognize their authority or something, because U-S-A! U-S-A!

      • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -77 months ago

        Mhhh yes lying about WMDs in Iraq to bomb the entire country to rubble and steal their oil. That’s a lot worse than bribing a porn star

        • @Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I’m sure it goes without saying, but legal wrongs and moral wrongs are very different things, like in this case.

          The argument would be “I’m immune because it’s a presidential act” and not “I did the right thing.” Kind of like how cops get away with horrible shit because of qualified immunity.

    • AbsentBird
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I agree, but apparently presidents are immune from prosecution for anything done in office. I really hope that can get overturned, but it’s the current state of the law.