• @gallopingsnail
          link
          61 month ago

          Don’t deliberately ignore nuance to start internet arguments. ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

          • @PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            -11 month ago

            I’m asking for the nuance. I’m asking for the lines in the sand. I choose to primarily talk to leftists for a reason. The fact that a conversation about ethics is beyond the pale is nutter butters.

        • @Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          01 month ago

          OOOh, guess I touched a nerve there.

          I mean, I get it. I’ve seen plenty of guys like you on the webs. Keyboard warriors who think they are tough minded, but somehow never manage to actually talk to a girl. Guys who are too scared to go to a Starbucks because the baristas intimidate them.

          I mean, what are you going to do now your hero Andrew Tate is in jail?

          It’s sad in one way.

          So, so sad.

          • @PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            31 month ago

            Pointing out that you’re avoiding the argument isn’t exactly triggered. And I’m arguing in favor of non-aggression, so your attempts to hide your failings are worse than the initial gambit.

            • YeetPics
              link
              fedilink
              4
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              avoiding the argument

              You seem determined to locate the argument. Is that somehow a more valid stance than not wanting to engage?

            • @Dagwood222@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              -31 month ago

              You just can’t let it go, can you?

              I point out that you’re obsessed with the fanmail serial killers get and instead of just ignoring it, you decide to double down.

              Guess it really, really keeps you up at night.

              • @PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                51 month ago

                I feel like you’re having trouble following instead of just refusing to confront internal inconsistencies at this point. Either way, hug a dead veteran today.

                • @Dagwood222@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -71 month ago

                  Hmmm, let’s see.

                  I speak out against idolizing mass murderers, and the first thing you think of is girls writing to serial killers.

                  You could have talked about things like sports teams with names like “Vikings,” or “Raiders.”

                  You could have talked about movies like “The Godfather” or TV show “Black Sails.”

                  No, you went with your obsession; the women who constantly scorn, deride, belittle, and/or ridicule you on a daily basis.

                  You’re the one who brought up the idea of women flagrantly throwing themselves at the lowest scum while you sit alone and miserable, crying over your keyboard and smashing your head against the wall in anguish.

                  You bring it up because that’s what haunts your thoughts, day and night.

                  And how do I know this? What makes me so sure?

                  Anyone who isn’t obsessed like you would have simply stopped responding.

                  Like they say, truth let’s the facts speak for themselves, but lies repeat over and over.

                  • @PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    61 month ago

                    You’re off your rocker. I chose a ridiculous example, because they idolize mass murderers and at most need therapy rather than a bullet - but that outcome fits your poorly thought out definition.

                    Keep reaching.