• BraveSirZaphod
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    The point is that carbon taxes can price those environmental externalities into the actual cost of the product, and that money can be invested into climate-friendly projects.

    • @bloodfart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Does everyone get a raise too?

      Shouldn’t the carbon tax be paid out to the places with the mines and factories?

      • BraveSirZaphod
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Shifting towards environmentally friendly practices does cost money, yes, and that money will have to come from somewhere. Directly imposing it on companies will naturally cause it to be passed on to the consumer in higher prices.

        You seem to be suggesting that we should somehow magically eliminate climate-harmful processes while preserving the cheap costs, the demand for which being exactly what got us into this mess in the first place. The world doesn’t work that way.

        But, again, the money raised can be used towards investing into and subsidizing climate-friendly processes, which can result in those products being cost-competitive.

        • @bloodfart@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Okay no one gets a raise to pay for this stuff, loud and clear.

          Is the carbon tax money at least going to go to the places with the extractive and intensive industries the carbon comes from?

          • BraveSirZaphod
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            If you can find a politically acceptable policy that makes money for raises to everyone suddenly appear, lots of people would be very interested in that.

            You cannot demand that we stop using cheap processes and then simultaneously be surprised that the alternatives are less cheap, but for the final time - and I’m afraid I’ll be checking out here - revenue can be used to subsidize those alternatives and make them more affordable.

            Cheers.