• @ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If you present me with a trolley problem in which the only way to destroy Hamas also kills a million children, I won’t know what the right answer is. I suppose it would depend on what would happen to Israel if Hamas wasn’t destroyed.

    However, the moral calculus for nations is not the same as it is for individuals. The standard established the last time the Western world fought a war it took seriously does seem to be “as many as it takes” and I suspect that this would still be the standard if such a war happened again. (All those nuclear missiles we have ready aren’t precise weapons…) In that context, demanding that Israel should show restraint that other countries haven’t and wouldn’t seems like hypocrisy.

    • Flying SquidM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      If you present me with a trolley problem in which the only way to destroy Hamas also kills a million children, I won’t know what the right answer is

      Seriously? You don’t know?

      Because I would say most people on this planet would say don’t kill the million children.

      • @ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        It’s easy to act self-righteous when that has no consequences, but in practice most people on this planet live in countries (including democratic countries) that probably would actually kill the children in an analogous scenario.

        • Flying SquidM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          Okay? But this was about you, not the governments that run those countries. You said you wouldn’t know what the right answer is.

          The right answer is obviously don’t kill a million children and the fact that you don’t realize that it’s obvious is highly disturbing to say the least.