• @Wooki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    0
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You’re perpetuating it as a win. Its not. Its not close to bare minimum. The cost of this should have been:

    1. Sales refunds
    2. Fine (much larger because its to small and because they are flying lose with personal safety)
    3. Damages to customers. It would be safe to assumed every person was placed in harms way that purchased these devices.

    Incoherent ramblings.

    Cool story bro

    • @Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Don’t put words in my mouth. You’re the one refusing to move past the fact that I chose to refer to your idea of a refund as part of the fine. Get back to me when you make an effort to understand the actual points I’m making. Actually, don’t bother, you’re not worth my time any longer.