• @Forester@yiffit.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    -1
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I’m glad you took the time to completely not read the article that I sent you. I know you didn’t read it because if you had read it, you would see that we have discovered several times over the past few billion years that nature had made its own deposits of nuclear material in the same manner as we are advising the waste to be deposited in. It’s not new science. We have evidence of it occurring naturally multiple times and no issues from that. No spread of radiation from that. No inundation of groundwater from that. But yes you’re correct and all the nuclear scientists are wrong clearly.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horizontal_drillhole_disposal

    Next time you find a term you don’t understand. Try clicking on the hyperlink.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_geological_repository

    • @uzay@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      37 months ago

      Whether it would work or not wasn’t even the main point of what I said. But that doesn’t matter to you anyway as your strategy to debate seems to be to call others stupid often enough until everyone else understands how smart you are. Good luck with that.

      • @Forester@yiffit.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        -3
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        if someone gives you cited information and you refuse to read the cited information, then You’re not stupid. You’re willfully ignorant which is far worse. It’s not dangerous waste if it’s properly handled and treated and disposed of.