NeuromancerM to Conservative@lemm.ee • 3 months agoFTC Announces Rule Banning Noncompeteswww.ftc.govexternal-linkmessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up130arrow-down114cross-posted to: workreform@lemmy.worldantiwork@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
arrow-up116arrow-down1external-linkFTC Announces Rule Banning Noncompeteswww.ftc.govNeuromancerM to Conservative@lemm.ee • 3 months agomessage-square11fedilinkcross-posted to: workreform@lemmy.worldantiwork@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
minus-square@jimbolauski@lemm.eelinkfedilink1•2 months agoImo the only way non-competes should be used is if the employeer intends on paying the former employee during the non-compete period.
minus-squareNeuromancerOPMlinkfedilink-1•2 months agoagreed. I have seen them abused many times. If you have that much company secrets then they should pay you until those age away. Those are protected by patents and other laws anyways.
Imo the only way non-competes should be used is if the employeer intends on paying the former employee during the non-compete period.
agreed. I have seen them abused many times.
If you have that much company secrets then they should pay you until those age away. Those are protected by patents and other laws anyways.