@nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 8 months agoMicrosoft has ‘let Blizzard be Blizzard’ following its acquisition, studio sayswww.videogameschronicle.comexternal-linkmessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1106arrow-down12cross-posted to: pcgaming@lemmy.ca
arrow-up1104arrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft has ‘let Blizzard be Blizzard’ following its acquisition, studio sayswww.videogameschronicle.com@nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksM to Games@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 8 months agomessage-square40fedilinkcross-posted to: pcgaming@lemmy.ca
minus-squareRefurbished RefurbisherlinkEnglish6•edit-28 months agoHas King even made anything other than Candy Crush? Seems like they’re just a shitty mobile game company.
minus-squareRefurbished RefurbisherlinkEnglish7•edit-28 months agoWonder how much it cost to make Candy Crush. The profit margins must be rediculous on something that isn’t even an original concept and is filled with ads.
minus-square@Kelly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish5•edit-28 months agoThey are a company that makes shitty mobile games, but the revenue has look good if you view games as business. https://www.businessofapps.com/data/candy-crush-statistics/
minus-square@Mikufan@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish2•8 months agoI think yes but under other names, but even if not its a cashcow.
Has King even made anything other than Candy Crush? Seems like they’re just a shitty mobile game company.
Shitty mobile game companies make a shit ton of money.
Wonder how much it cost to make Candy Crush. The profit margins must be rediculous on something that isn’t even an original concept and is filled with ads.
They are a company that makes shitty mobile games, but the revenue has look good if you view games as business.
https://www.businessofapps.com/data/candy-crush-statistics/
I think yes but under other names, but even if not its a cashcow.