The perpetrator forcibly transferred one or more persons. *
Such person or persons belonged to a particular national, ethnical, racial or religious group.
The perpetrator intended to destroy, in whole or in part, that national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as
such.
The transfer was from that group to another group.
The person or persons were under the age of 18 years.
The perpetrator knew, or should have known, that the person or persons were under the age of 18 years.
The conduct took place in the context of a manifest pattern of similar conduct directed against that group
or was conduct that could itself effect such destruction
* The term “forcibly” is not restricted to physical force, but may include threat of force or coercion, such as that caused by fear of violence,
duress, detention, psychological oppression or abuse of power, against such person or persons or another person, or by taking advantage of a
coercive environment
I’d love to know your thinking here. You picked the one country that’s been constantly reporting Isreal to the international courts for genocide.
Or were you imagining a District 9 situation?
The best candidate for Israel would be the US, that’s where their biggest source of immigrants is. If you’re moving millions of people you’d need to send them to wealthy countries.
Interesring approach. It may not have masses of religions but it’s sometimes called the Rainbow Nation because it has like 8 major ethnicities/cultures.
But since the majority of older people were victims of Apartheid (during which Israel supported the racist Apartheid regime at the time) and South Africa have been calling out Israel for practicing apartheid for decades, it would be about as stirring the pot as you can get.
removed by mod
You did it bro. You picked the one objectively wrong choice. Congratulation!
It’s a troll that got kicked off of Reddit last week under the same username.
glassing the region seems worse. but you know what they say, always end the bloodline.
Fun fact, that’s still genocide.
removed by mod
ICC Elements of Crimes, Article 6 (e):
Genocide by forcibly transferring children
Elements
* The term “forcibly” is not restricted to physical force, but may include threat of force or coercion, such as that caused by fear of violence, duress, detention, psychological oppression or abuse of power, against such person or persons or another person, or by taking advantage of a coercive environment
removed by mod
So, a police state for children?
If “the area” being evacuated includes Israel, I could potentially get behind this.
removed by mod
Alternately, they could just trade. Palestinians get moved to Israel, Israelis get moved to Gaza, since they want it so much.
removed by mod
I’d love to know your thinking here. You picked the one country that’s been constantly reporting Isreal to the international courts for genocide.
Or were you imagining a District 9 situation?
The best candidate for Israel would be the US, that’s where their biggest source of immigrants is. If you’re moving millions of people you’d need to send them to wealthy countries.
removed by mod
Interesring approach. It may not have masses of religions but it’s sometimes called the Rainbow Nation because it has like 8 major ethnicities/cultures.
But since the majority of older people were victims of Apartheid (during which Israel supported the racist Apartheid regime at the time) and South Africa have been calling out Israel for practicing apartheid for decades, it would be about as stirring the pot as you can get.
And where exactly are you going to evacuate an entire country?