• Jaysyn
    link
    fedilink
    478 months ago

    They’ve already overturned her twice. They know she’s an incompetent hack & beholden to Trump.

    I said it yesterday, she wants to be removed at a late enough stage of the trial that it will take another judge past the election to get up to speed on the case.

    • @JaymesRS@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      238 months ago

      It’s important to note too that the ones overturning her were appointed by conservative presidents. It’s that blatantly bad.

      • Neato
        link
        fedilink
        English
        128 months ago

        We just have to hope their conservative bias doesn’t go so far as a fascist takeover. The Bush years were bad but not on this level of corrupt.

    • @grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      98 months ago

      Why do people keep calling her incompetent? As far as I can tell, she’s been doing her job – being a blatantly corrupt ally of Trump – perfectly.

      What opportunity to skew the trial in Trump’s favor has she not taken advantage of? 'Cause that’s the true measure of her being incompetent.

      • @paddirn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yeah, this seems more on the order of weaponized incompetence, it’s giving the appearance of incompetence for a specific purpose so she can try to avoid claims of corruption or bias. Otherwise, she’s doing the job she was put in there to do, that’s why Trump and the GOP were so hot on getting all those Judges appointed.