I’ve run across these terms several times, but without enough context to figure out what they mean. Could someone help me out, please?

ETA All of you are amazing! A huge thank you to everyone who responded, and an extra thank you to those who have provided links or explanations to further and/or related information. I am learning so much by reading all of these comments!

  • speck
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    What if you agree with the former but also agree with criticism of those regimes?

    • ExecutiveStapler
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      If you genuinely accept critiques of Iran, China, and Russia as well as disliking the West’s capitalism then you’re just a communist, not a tankie. However if you just kinda accept critiques in a “No one’s perfect” kinda way but still cheer when Russians shoot Ukrainians, you’d be a tankie who fell for Russian propaganda. I’d recommend looking into the firehose of falsehood, it informs a lot about certain righties’ and lefties’ perspectives.

      • danhakimi
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        You’re not even necessarily a communist. I don’t call myself a communist, but yeah, there are problems with capitalism, that’s not a weird thing to say.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Anti-authoritarian collectivist/socialists are usually categorized as anarchists. At least that’s what the tankies call me.

      • elscallr
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        I’m fine being called an anarchist but I prefer the term “voluntarist”.

        As long as I’m free to opt out of the collectivism I’m happy to live alongside it and encourage others to engage with it if they want.

    • Cylusthevirus
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      That’s just regular old black and white thinking. Every time you’ve decided that an “ism” is the root of all the world’s evils you’ve lost the game. Doesn’t matter what it is. The “isms” are never the source of the trouble; that would be humanity itself.