@return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world • 3 months agoBiden reacts to pro-Palestinian protesters: 'They have a point'www.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square492fedilinkarrow-up1594arrow-down121
arrow-up1573arrow-down1external-linkBiden reacts to pro-Palestinian protesters: 'They have a point'www.nbcnews.com@return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world • 3 months agomessage-square492fedilink
minus-squareSybillinkfedilink-1•3 months ago , I’m not really sure what the point is that you’re making. i’m saying don’t use dishonest rhetoric
minus-square@lennybird@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-23 months agoI’m fine with that; just make sure you go to the other user in the thread and say the same thing. Did you do that? Did you tell them as well that, “it takes two to tango”? Curiously you did not.
minus-squareSybillinkfedilink1•3 months agodo you think they would be more willing than you to stop engaging dishonestly?
minus-square@lennybird@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-23 months agoWho’s engaging dishonestly? Citation needed. That has yet to be substantively evinced.
minus-squareSybillinkfedilink2•3 months agoyou admitted that you were using fallacious rhetoric already (thouh your admission is not necessary: it was prima facie). but you also (correctly) pointed out a strawman, which is also fallacious rhetoric.
minus-squareSybillinkfedilink1•3 months ago Did you do that? Did you tell them as well that, “it takes two to tango”? Curiously you did not. i asked you to be the bigger person.
minus-square@lennybird@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-23 months agoDouble-standard. Ask both. Go on… It “takes two to tango,” after all.
minus-squareSybillinkfedilink1•3 months agoyou’ll forgive me if this reads as though you are not only acting in bad faith, but know you are, and plan to continue.
i’m saying don’t use dishonest rhetoric
I’m fine with that; just make sure you go to the other user in the thread and say the same thing.
Did you do that?
Did you tell them as well that, “it takes two to tango”?
Curiously you did not.
do you think they would be more willing than you to stop engaging dishonestly?
Who’s engaging dishonestly? Citation needed. That has yet to be substantively evinced.
you admitted that you were using fallacious rhetoric already (thouh your admission is not necessary: it was prima facie). but you also (correctly) pointed out a strawman, which is also fallacious rhetoric.
i asked you to be the bigger person.
Double-standard.
Ask both. Go on… It “takes two to tango,” after all.
you’ll forgive me if this reads as though you are not only acting in bad faith, but know you are, and plan to continue.