10 U.S. Code § 12406 - National Guard In Federal Service
(3): […] Orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the states
Trump specifically did not engage with Newsom in commandeering CA National Guard troops.
You skipped over reading this part.
Extraordinary rendition is absolutely illegal, especially when it is done without due process and against a court’s order such as the case of Garcia or the dozens of other people flown to CECOT. “Just following orders” isn’t a defense. And I’m sorry to say, but as a federal law enforcement officer, they specifically chose to put themselves and their families on the line for their country. That’s why they are paid and trained and supplied with all manner of paramilitary equipment. What cowards to hide behind masks. They should be proud of the job they are doing and be recognized for it since it is totally within the confines of the law, right? And even more so, to hide behind their families’ “safety” as if that absolves them from their shit behavior. No masks for law enforcement. They are public servants and must follow the law.
Well that’s strange, don’t you think? Why did he usurp Newsom’s power in CA, but refused to do so in DC? Could it be that he would stand to gain something if the coup succeeded?
is by definition a rebellious act.
This is conflating “rebellious” with a rebellion. Rebellion is an uprising that resists and is organized against one’s government. The scale and degree matter, here. Your definition would turn any civil disobedience into a “rebellion” which is farcical on its face.
Maybe the ICE officers should also stop wearing masks to hide from being accountable for their illegal actions.
Is a riot actually a rebellion? No. Is breaking the law a rebellious act? No.
Was January 6 a riot or a rebellion?
10 U.S. Code § 12406 - National Guard In Federal Service
(3): […] Orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the states
Trump specifically did not engage with Newsom in commandeering CA National Guard troops.
18 U.S. Code § 1385 - Use of Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Space Force as posse comitatus
Whoever, except in cases and under the circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the Air Force, or the Space Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
Using the military for ICE enforcement is against the law.
Want more information? https://youtu.be/zJ7Dfca4_y8
Dude, you’re a muppet if you think everything he has done is within the law. The only reason he is getting away with breaking the law is because the only check is the legislature’s power of impeachment and it has been captured by the fascists.
You absolutely correct. Breakdown of the law has been a problem in the US since the hard bank right into fascism. But I am way less bothered by throwing bricks at the cosplaying nazis and way more bothered by the unitary executive bullshit. We should have a president, which should be a glorified administrator working for the legislature. Not a king that ignores the law. If we need to burn some of the oligarchy’s shit to remind the orange asshole of this, so be it.
B-b-but whatabout all the rich people’s stuff 👉👈 🥺? Someday, I could have all of that rich people stuff and that could be my stuff on fire and that would make me so sad!
Consider looking into Soylent/Joylent equivalents (Queal, Huel, etc.). The macros will be better than a slimfast with more fiber. It will come as a powder you’ll need to mix. But nutrition wise, will be more balanced than protein powder shakes and you can get them in vegan varieties. I use a gram-accurate food scale to measure out my portions and I mix it with almond milk.
Don’t forget the record scratch
It isn’t pointless if you wanted to poison someone with psilocybin and had a misconception about the LD50. It’d be a really useful, helpful fact, actually. So, uhh. Thanks OP. I almost made a terrible mistake.
on carnivore the approach will not reduce basal metabolic rate
Do you have some peer reviewed science that backs this claim? I’d be really interested in learning more.
Yup, I’m aware that bioavailability is a thing. For people trying to gain weight, this is their primary problem. I know people who have had gastric bypass and they have all sorts of issues with nutrient absorption. But that ultimately doesn’t change the methodology here. If you are tracking your intake and your output and notice a discrepancy between your prediction and your result (what the scale says), then you still have a measurement problem. It is still CICO and always will be CICO regardless of the modifications necessary to fully account for the differences between your prediction and measurement because physics.
Speaking of combustion, you are essentially a internal combustion engine with more moving parts. Your cellular processes all need fuel to operate. That fuel comes from eating. And it’s expenditure is both autonomic and willful. It isn’t an oversimplification. It is a broad generalization that applies very well regardless of the specifics of metabolism and has been demonstrated time and time again in study after study. Just leaf through all of the citations in the paper I linked. This paper was essentially a meta study, or study of studies. There is a massive body of research that backs this generalization.
CICO is factually true, if you account for all inputs and outputs, but its clinically not very helpful.
Can you explain further why this science isn’t helpful clinically? Because of the study I linked specifically discusses a 25% reduction in energy intake and metabolic adjustment to the new lower EI within 12 months. Then further goes on to discuss the mechanics of why that is (reduction in body mass decreases your energy requirements, thus lowering your TDEE). Take a look at fig 1.
That doesn’t sounds like 1000kcal deficits to me, but only 25%. Assuming 2000kcal TDEE, that’s only 500kcal.
And somehow, this is still a more sane immigration policy
The Flaws of Calorie Counting and CICO Model: Bart stresses that while gross calorie deficits (e.g., cutting 1000+ calories a day) can lead to fat loss, moderate calorie restriction often fails due to the body’s adaptive lowering of BMR. This homeostatic mechanism defends the body’s fat stores, debunking the simplistic energy-in-energy-out narrative. The takeaway is that calorie counting alone is insufficient without considering metabolic adaptations.
I’ll just point out that you can’t escape the second law of thermodynamics. Failures in CICO are always a measurement issue either on the input or on the output. Your BMR won’t dip more than 5-15% on a caloric restriction. On a 2000kcal TDEE, that’s only 300kcal max. If you’re cutting 500kcal a day, that is still a 200kcal deficit. Does moderate restriction fail because of this? Maybe if that person gets frustrated at the reduced rate of loss. But that’s an expectation problem due to an output measurement issue. CICO is just sciencing your body and that means accounting for errors.
No. That is far, far below sufficient. An example of a rebellion is when the confederacy decided slaves were more important than unity and literally attempted to form another government. There are many other examples of rebellion you can draw from history, and from fiction that all seek usurping power and wholesale replacement of the existing government. That is a whole different ballgame than harassing some cosplaying nazis that are overstepping the bounds of civility and getting butthurt that people aren’t licking their boots.