

Cool find. Thanks for sharing! Glad to see more Lunarpunk related content that isn’t related to crypto. I signed up for the newsletter. Would love to bring Reddit users and the creator of this website to this community.
Mastodon https://kolektiva.social/@SteveKLord
Pixelfed https://anar.chi.st/SteveKLord
Letterboxd https://letterboxd.com/steveklord/
Matrix https://matrix.to/#/@steveklord:matrix.org XMPP steveklord@yax.im
Cool find. Thanks for sharing! Glad to see more Lunarpunk related content that isn’t related to crypto. I signed up for the newsletter. Would love to bring Reddit users and the creator of this website to this community.
Thanks for the clarification
It’s not whataboutism. It’s getting the priorities straight and not getting distracted by false problems.
The article posted facts and supported findings. These are not “false problems” and are posted for information and discussion, not as a distraction.
What is raised in the article is not specific to renewables. It’s pretty much generalized as soon as you have private interests.
The article is specifically about issues pertaining to the industry producing and selling renewables in California, USA. I have no private issues other than the sharing of information and constructive discussions about it. A share is not necessarily an endorsement and will not be received equally by all viewers though we should be able to engage in discussions without making assumptions about other users or unnecessarily pointing fingers.
So isolating renewables is improper and demagogic.
The focus of this community is green energy and there will be posts that focus on renewables. This post is on topic and posts from others are are always welcome, provided no false information is shared and discussions don’t get combative.
Agreed that oil and gas are far worse in these aspects.
Let’s not succumb to whataboutism, however. These are still important issues to consider to keep green energy sources ethical and to prevent corporate corruption and greenwashing of these alternative energy sources. This should be worth considering for those interested in green energy , especially for solarpunks practicing prefigurative politics, to prevent these issues in the future.
Do you mind providing a source for this information? It seems to contradict this
Maybe so but the article isn’t really talking about that. It just used that as a phrase to exemplify the versatility of batteries and how these could be a greener solution for advanced technologies they are used for.
Inside seems like a good idea in that heat. I wasn’t getting the most direct sunlight inside, 6 hours is recommended, so I was leaving it outside in the direct sun and I think that may have been too much as it would be in full bloom one day and then the flowers would droop not much later.
I can’t comment on bird migration with any expertise but I can say that street light is considerably brighter and I can’t really see these contributing to light pollution. The bioluminescence comes from an enzyme that exists in mushrooms and other organisms in nature fairly frequently already.
Mine ultimately didn’t survive through last summer but it was worth the purchase. I’m sure in the right conditions they’ll thrive so I’m tempted to get another. It doesn’t look like they’re in any stores near me but I assume the plants would be pretty healthy if you bought one at a florist.
You and @Mihies@programming.dev can find more info about the project including many more articles on their website . The company is responsible for the world’s largest solar project . Do you have anything to support your arguments? You have been presented with counter arguments and not provided any info . Why do you think they wouldn’t have considered clouds in Indiana?
That’s one of the many Myths about solar energy as home panels do work on cloudy days and a solar farm of this magnitude would have to consider that before reaching this phase .
No worries, friend. It’s a valid point. Publications do try to pull readers in with vague wording sometimes. If the rest of the world follows China’s model maybe things will improve on a more global scale.
I don’t read it that way as it doesn’t specify at all. That’s the article’s headline. It’s just shared as it is
They’re fairly new and it’s early in the season so maybe you’ll be surprised one night. Depending on how much artificial light there is nearby like street lights they might be hard to notice and the could seem a little faint as they show up more in darkness. It would be a cool sight to see them light up a neighborhood once someone plants a bunch though.
These Petunias have been in circulation for over a year. The only difference is that you can buy them in-store as well as online now. They are not an invasive species but very common. I have heard of no problems as of yet and I think any issues would be extremely minor and putting some flowers out there is a net positive considering climate change and electric light pollution. I don’t think we have much to worry about.
Agreed but I don’t think that’s what the article is trying to say.
Thanks. That’s effectively what the article says. It’s confirming what locals have long known / suspected. Thanks for your perspective.
I don’t see that at all. The article focuses on how strong Solar Power is in Pakistan without mass green energy policy from the government. Its performing strongly due to popular demand and implementation
Good catch. Hopefully some users from this community will make submissions.