

they are claiming the man is in violation of title 18 section 2232 for inputting what seems to be a duress pin that initiated a wipe on the device when they tried to seize it.
said section does not talk about reasoning for searches though, it uses the terms “lawful authority” which in my eyes indicates that the search as a whole was lawful in the first place. It happend at a port authority though and those generally have weaker protections for citizen rights.








as an ammendum to this comment edit, catfriend edited the post linked and added this to the end