I think any praise directed at Valve should be directed at Newell.
Valve is a private company and therefore reflects the values of its owner.
Another similar example is Larian Studios and its owner Sven Vincke (sp?).
Both of these companies have done/are doing good things. But they don’t refute the criticisms of capitalism.
-
People like Newell and Vincke can create these privately owned companies with their wealth, but where did that wealth come from? I will applaud both those men for choosing to do good things but with the caveat that those decisions don’t exist in isolation and the acquisition of the wealth they needed to do cool things with their cool companies was definitely not an exploitation-free process.
-
What happens to those businesses when their owners retire/die? Valve and Larian are reflective of their owners, and their owners are swimming against the current. Capitalism rewards shitty behaviour, and ownership of those companies can easily pass to shitty people.
Valve is a blip in the system. It’s a good blip, but it’s not indicative of any redeemability in the capitalist system.























This is why I always branch a repo before letting AI anywhere near it. Sometimes you get fantastic results (like a day’s worth of code monkey grind in 5 mins) and sometimes the results are just preposterous. You always want to be able to review the results before anything touches main.