The term “eighty-six” is a verb, which the Merriam-Webster online dictionary defines as informally meaning “to refuse to serve” or “to eject or ban” a customer, and “to reject, discontinue, or get rid of” something.
Trump: “He called to have me killed!”
Calm down, snowflake in chief, he said you deserve to be let go. An opinion most of your country agrees with.
He. The fact that you assumed I’m a woman explains a lot about why you’d defend this.
Because that is the target audience, but not the explicit message.
Your bias colors the post in a light that is favorable to your interpretation. Interpreted from a wider lens, it is genuinely perpetuating sexism. You’ve simply internalized it.
A 2 week old account posting over 250 times in that tiny duration, spending every single post completely blasting the Liberals and pretending to care about the NDP.
Hmmm…
Not sure I’ve ever seen such an egregious case of being on someone’s payroll. Then again, I guess there’s a chance this is someone so cripplingly, unapologetically far down the right-wing misinformation pipeline that they’ve completely lost control of their life and spend every waking moment trying to get images of the Liberals inviting immigrants into Canada and shutting down oil pipelines out of their heads.
Oh come off it. You and I both know that the man in this image is not the butt of the “joke,” and it’s an insult to both our intelligence to pretend otherwise. Fucking sad that it’s 2025 and we’re still defending pathetic positions like “the only thing that really impresses women is wealth” under the guise of shit like “no, no, see, he’s old, so it’s actually a deep and nuanced boomer humor Facebook post from Grandpa.”
Sling insults and argue ad hominem to try and deflect all you want, this meme is base level, early 2000s sexism.
Ah yes, classic boomer misogyny disguised as a meme.
I mean, the post sure is shit, I’ll give it that much.
I am hard convinced that most “Albertan” seperatists are genuinely astroturfers trying to sway Canadian politics.
The ones that are legit are your bog-standard victimized conservative types. Every hardship they’ve ever faced is the fault of someone taking something they “deserve” with no genuine logic behind it rather than a self-centered belief that they are entitled to a level of prosperity that the majority of the world can barely dream of. So they aren’t mad about one or more clear things; it’s the general sense that they deserve more than they’ve been given, and the constant lie that others have been taking from them.
When you get the letter of the rule, but completely miss the spirit.
“Everyone who is critical of me is woke.”
I know it’s not the point, but this toeing of the age line is just as gross as going after minors imo. We need to respect the nuances of human relationships rather than reducing it to a number.
Mind you I get that this guy identifies as having aspergers, so nuance is not his fortee, but still.
Jesus was a socialist.
I hate that you get downvoted for pointing out the reality of the situation.
Relative to the price of everything else, $80 for a AAA videogame is actually reasonable. The problem is that rent has gone up drastically, food has gone up drastically, and our wages have stagnated. Getting pissed off at Gearbox for charging $80 for Borderlands 4, and then paying $15 for a burger and fries without an equal reaction just doesn’t seem sensible to me.
Everything is awful, and videogame devs aren’t the ones stealing all our buying power.
Uh, excuse me? They’re not American. Their skin is 1-2 shades too brown. They were here for the land and jobs that belongs to honest, god-fearing Americans.
/s because holy fuck, that could be a real response today.
Exaclty. I can find you an indie game in the last couple years for each top-line category. Well, except coding the entire game in assembly. I mean, it’s a flex, but we just don’t live in that world of necessity anymore.
I agree. The war in Ukraine can only truly be resolved by removing it’s root causes. Remove Putin, and the war ends.
How dare you dimish the ability of others to read and write just because you disagree with them. They read every state-managed publication from start to finish, and absorb the propagandized messaging perfectly fine.
These tankies would applaud the same kind of treatment for ‘liberals’ today as was given to the protesters in Tienanmen Square by the CCP in 1989.
I mean, it’s right there, with 24 upvotes.
“TOTAL LIB-DEATH”
They defend the events at Tiananmin Square because it’s exactly what they want: the mass murder of people who disagree with them. “Denialism” is just a strategy to maintain the guise of moral superiority.
“Taking cover from what?” has that wonderful “States rights to do what?” energy.
“See, they weren’t massacred! Look at this snapshot long before the end of the event where many people are alive, taking cover from a hail of bullets, and successfully hiding for their lives! Checkmate, libs!”
I’d argue if they somehow remain a billionaire post mortem, then no, they’re still not a good billionaire.