Info Sec - Software Engineer - Game Designer - Mod Dev - Digital Artist

  • 0 Posts
  • 114 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 9th, 2023

help-circle

  • You want to tell developers from mass layoffs trying to pay rent that they would be ‘bored’ in a lower paying job? Or they are effectively blacklisted for being ‘overqualified’ in a slop addicted job market that refuses to pay for that expertise?

    Excuse me but fuck all that. HR can absolutely make it clear if there is no-expectation of upward movement or pay increase for the job. Sure HR can and should give lesser experienced applicants a chance if they meet the criteria, but outright denying one based on being ‘over-qualified’ is, and always has been, bullshit.


  • Not the house part directly but I got the work part repeatedly after graduation from my own family (who are renting). It was constant verbal harassment about laziness and ‘not wanting to work’ under threats of being kicked out onto the street. Stopped only after a job agency they picked had every partnered employer reject me and my degree for 6 months straight. The only reason given was a paradoxical “overqualified and under-experienced” which is to say the boomer retoric of “degrees = jobs” was fatally backwards in an era where employers only offered minimum wage for the job responsibilities of 3 people.

    Took 4 years after university to land my first job and only as a contract labor hire on an assembly line in late 2019… FML. Spent the past 5 years of underpaid work forcing my way back into software QA just in time for the era of slop… FML part 2. I now make decent money and live with my partner but to my parents it’s like those 4 years of victim blaming never happened and my success is magically attributable to their ‘support’.

    TLDR: It is absolutely a real mindset still driving boomer cognitive dissonance with reality.









  • Besides leadership you also need to account for the fact that, for better or worse, WW2 & 9-11 united both military and civilian logistics against a commom goal with international support. It made for brutal efficiency anywhere on the planet and gave rise to all the memes we know of now.

    By contrast, this orange shitstain has fucked the economy, civilians, geopolitics, and most importantly the international logistics to project that military power in a way that isn’t a complete embarrassment. Even if a competent progressive leader replaced him, this can’t be fixed in a single term either and that is by intentional design of the Heritage Foundation that instructs Trump’s actions under the derangement.




  • Corporations spent hundreds of billions on LLMs to crator the value of skilled labor, justify mass layoffs, and launder stolen content, all to cut cost. Whether it’s legal regulations or basic human rights, in the eyes of sycophants, any perceived risk to their profit margin is deemed unacceptable including their own employees.

    Smaller companies are themselves not meant to survive and intended to diversify legal risks and consequences (e.g. Alphabet and Meta split from Google and Facebook). This way they can be dismantled and sold once the legal baggage becomes unprofitable without risking the wealth that has long since been funnelled to its ‘legally distinct’ owners. The collateral damage to the now unemployed is simply one less thing off their balance sheet and is much easier to do when you have home turf legal corruption advantages.

    So no, it’s not about generating stable wealth long term as it is about capturing any source of capital by any means necessary, legality and morals be damned.



  • This sounds like OpenID with extra steps. A signed JWT could serve the same purpose without reinventing the wheel and inherit all privacy and scope controls out of the box. For example, a site can send a userid and challenge that I hash before authorising my identity provider to attach a signed age attestation to. Provider can’t see the hash contents and the site only gets to see the pre-verified age in the JWT and nothing else identifiable (could even be a regional yes/no of-age value or content flags).

    All that said, you’d be hard pressed to find any company that wouldn’t immediately regect something that could not be collected, sold, or abused. The law was never about the children in the first place and they’re not about to have a change of heart on that any time soon.



  • The laws were never meant for children or whoever they put on paper, and they will absolutely not show their hand in its real purpose so soon. Let’s not forget that the US, UK, and AU are part of the Five Eyes and will absolutely share the linked IDs they’re collecting. AU openly admitted the law was not effective as did every expert on the matter, but won’t repeal it anyway.

    A recent example of this covert repurposing was the GDID in Microsoft supposedly for (ineffective) DRM that was conveniently capable of de-anonymising Windows users at the whim of authorities.

    It’s never been about what they say they’re doing, but rather what they could do to abuse that capability, and that’s what has people up in arms.