Esse youtuber parece acreditar que o objetivo com o USAID é mais interno que externo. Que o que Trump está buscando é consolidar poder dentro dos EUA, retirando recursos de instituições com alto grau de autonomia para, posteriormente, usar recursos a partir de fontes que ele controla diretamente.
Tem isso. Talvez a dificuldade em ver o objetivo seja porque não é um objetivo para os estados Unidos, mas para sua oligarquia. Se a gente muda de perspectiva, talvez seja mais fácil entender o jogo.
Tenho muita dificuldade em aceitar essa explicação de que são apenas loucos, sem lógica. Mesmo que tenham medo, vão criar um objetivo, que alcançado, elimina a causa do medo. Não é possível que não haja uma definição do que seria uma “vitória” estadunidense, qual o endgame que eles perseguem.
Depois de postar isso ontem vi um comentário na Internet apostando na volta da divisão do mundo em zonas de influência. Um recuo dos EUA, de influência global para influência regional poderia ser um objetivo, fortalecendo a posição em uma parte do globo e abandonando outras.
O problema é que embora seja relativamente fácil ver quais as áreas abandonadas, quais seriam as fortalecidas? Por lógica, seriam as Américas, mas tanta hostilidade com Canadá e México só fazem sentido caso o objetivo seja realmente uma anexação.
A sala de chat chama inferno?
But tou don’t have permission to do. And hacking a binary is much more difficult than specializing a model, for instance.
The model is, in the sense you can modify it. Further train it, integrate in your app, etc. But the recipe to make the model is not.
And yes, it’s less open source than we can think at first sight.
The models are open source meaning you can download them and run them. But the training data and code to train the model is not. So, they stills control the model, as there is no way to replicate it.
The question is put on wrong terms. All social order is derived from violence. What make the law, the law is the menace of violence. What supports democratic institutions are the violence of police and military against who don’t abide the order. So, violence is inescapable. The righ question is not if it’s justified, but WHO and WHEN have the right to commit violence. When put under these terms, it’s much more simpler question.
Lithuania wants to normalize relations but can’t help itself and say China is not democratic, don’t acknowledge its past errors and say China is a threat to Lithuania.
Sure, they are masters of diplomacy.
Uahahahaba Good analogy. I agree.
Real wages are declining, so the economy is bad. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_income_in_the_United_States#/media/File:Wages_in_the_United_States.webp
He is a furry that identify as a wolf. /s
NATO is looking great with USA threatening to annex two of it’s members.
Most big open source projects like Linux are entirely US and Europe dominated
Linux not so much
Reading the white paper you find the “serverless” has servers. Each community needs to be always online to serve captchas to posters. The system is federated on community level, instead of instance level, and uses DHT instead of DNS.
Reading the white paper you find the “serverless” has servers. Each community needs to be always online to serve captchas to posters. The system is federated on community level, instead of instance level, and uses DHT instead of DNS.
Some people report less server load with Piefed.
It’s legal if credit is given and it’s shared under CC-BY-SA.
https://www.fandom.com/licensing
Except where otherwise permitted, the text on Fandom communities (known as “wikis”) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike License 3.0 (Unported) (CC BY-SA).
Don’t spread their recruitment link. Delete your post and repost with the link censored.