CarbonScored [any]

Are we having an argument? Most likely I’m not trying to be a meanie, but I’m just struggling to understand / effectively communicate with yah.

  • 10 Posts
  • 1.35K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 28th, 2023

help-circle

  • As someone who would identify as being in your position about 5 years ago, I’ll still say regular group activities, hobby meetups (and volunteering if you have time/ability) are the best things. Joining a local walking group and board game group was a real turning point for me - Just getting used to people in a very casual context, with an activity to focus around, was great.

    I was basically unable to converse (it literally took me a week of agonising over making a ‘casual enough’ text asking to join), and after about a year of going every few weeks, I improved to just “kinda bad” at conversing, which has been such a life-changing step up. I started feeling able to start basic conversations with strangers, I actively engage and reach out to more people/organisations/events to thrust myself into social situations. And every now and then people actually express a desire to talk with me which is mind-bogglingly flattering.

    I think there’s plenty of luck still. If you can find one or two people who are good at starting conversations with you, then you can slowly steal their techniques and use them on others.

    Making long term friends is still hard, but these things are the best (though imperfect) solutions I’ve found. I think you just have to keep trying? I’m not sure. I’ve made a couple long-term friends online with games and niche wikis, but there’s no denying: It’s super hard. I’m still looking for better ways myself.














  • As well as agreeing with other rebuttals here, I’d like to again rebut the weird American exceptionalist take many leftists have, that its allied western countries are effectively ‘vassals’ being indirectly subsidised by America’s magical super wealth. And the implication that without America’s guiding power they would fall apart.

    They’re absolutely suck-ups to America’s big shooty power, but it’s a two-way deal. ‘western’ countries give America a free pass for war crimes, involvement in global diplomacy, and generous trade deals, and in return get to benefit from America’s military interventions. To say it’s a one-way subsidy is wrong, and almost lets other ‘western’ countries off the hook for their own awfulness part in global violence. They’re just partners in imperialism. If America pulls out militarily, ‘allied’ countries will (and already have started to) invest more in their own deadly military to do their own imperialism instead.

    There’s a big reason most of Europe is still indirectly buying Russian oil instead of fully transitioning to American oil, it’s because they know needing America economically will actually make them truly dependent.





  • I have not looked into what China’s doing, it’s probably fine, but for the record, destroying deserts is not necessarily a good thing.

    Deserts aren’t just useless land, like everything on Earth they’re a functioning part of a whole. Desert dust is an essential part of global fertilisation and the transport of microorganisms, climate change and affects basically every natural cycle and ecosystem on the planet. Destroying deserts on a large scale not only threatens extinction of a massive biodiversity, but threatens to change global weather patterns, temperature and water cycles in ways we are decades if not centuries away from significantly understanding.

    Again, not saying what China’s doing is necessarily bad, I don’t know what they’re doing. But deserts are actually kinda cool and very important.


  • I was alive and played games during that era, so I am aware! I’m very personally aware how much work we crammed from a tiny slow processor and a few kb.

    And though we probably wouldn’t describe those games as ‘poorly optimised’, there’s still absolutely huge room for optimisations. As you say, compilers have gotten a lot better, and we have better algorithms and data structures. In Quake especially, they basically did have order-of-magnitude gains by writing some parts in assembly. And they’ll have undoubtedly have written most of those parts very imperfectly.

    I may be skirting the bounds of reality more than you, by talking about what’s ‘theoretically possible’ compared to what’s possible by today’s knowledge and human practices. We agree there’d be some graphical compromise, maybe we’re just disagreeing over details of the scale of that compromise and the hardware that would be ‘permittable’ by this scenario.